TEI META Task Force: Agenda for Meeting, 22-23 Mar 04 [MEW10]
Location: AFNOR, Paris, 2pm 23rd March to 5pm, 24th March.
Expected participants Alejandro Bia, Syd Bauman, Lou Burnard, Sebastian Rahtz, Laurent Romary, Christian Wittern
Day one:
- The ODD language changes (study example files, ChangeLog, TD chapter of Guidelines)
- links to Docbook (study XML Europe 2004 paper)
Day two
- schema generation (study http://www.tei-c.org/P5/ ) and Roma (study http://www.tei-c.org/Roma/ )
- documentation generation
- documentation/markup of extensions (study examples for TEI Lite and Lampeter project)
- how to use <equiv> (eg in relation to ISO FS)
- internationalization layer (where? in Odds? separately?)
- future strategy for bases vs modules
Home work:
- *Alejandro
- Look at examples of tagdocs, and examine the use of the <equiv> element. Is this suitable for the internationalisation? if not, what is the best place to record that material? At what stage in the processing should it be implemented?
- *Christian
- Is the overall processing model of the TEI and the ODD language sufficently revealed?
- David
- The tension between literate programming and unnecessary wrapping of schema constructs. Is the ODD language useable for reading and writing by people who are not TEI editors?
- *Laurent
- The semantics and syntax of <equiv> . How do we use it it in practice for the ISO link? how would we maintain the correlations? do we have use cases of when it would be needed?
- *Lou
- Documenting the ODD language. Overview of new chapters (CE, FS, MS) to check that the new ODD language is expresssive enough for known future needs
- Michael
- Consider the ODD philosophy again. Is the new language too dependent on RelaxNG, as the old was on DTD are we abstract enough?
- Norm
- Look at naming. Do we have a flexible enough system to co-exist with Docbook?
- *Sebastian
- Consider how Roma can include partial documentation How to document extensions
- *Syd
- Is the new ODD language consistent and elegant ? are the tag names, attribute names etc right? are the DTDs and Schemas actually _right_?
Last recorded change to this page:
2007-09-16
• For corrections or updates, contact webmaster AT tei-c DOT org